Friday, 30 September 2011

Arrows of Kama

TO BE CRITICALLY ANALYSED


Kāma (Cupid) possesses five arrows, with which he inflicts all conditioned living entities. According to Śrīpāda Prabodhananda Sarasvatī (in his commentary on the Gīta-govinda), these arrows are: infatuation, agitation, heart-burning, extreme dryness and destruction. Let us elaborate:

During the course of one’s life, one sees many members of the opposite sex. There is a natural attraction caused by the arrangement of Māyā because we identify ourselves with the body (puṁsaḥ-striyā-maithunī-bhāva). It produces passionate heat in our bodies, which in turn unleashes the material desires stored within our hearts since time immemorial and also provides the drive to achieve them. Thus, the hṛdaya-granthi (material entanglement) is tightened, and we continue to undergo lifetimes of transmigration within various species.

Although there is natural attraction between the sexes in the material world, the conditioned souls (especially human beings) do not chase after the first visible object of enjoyment. Due to previous conditioning or saṁskāra, the mind has recorded certain enjoyable traits like beauty, education, wealth, fame, morality, etc., and favourable methods for association. When one finds prima facie some of these traits in a person and the opportunity to engage in association, Kāma releases his arrows:

The first arrow makes one infatuated. One identifies only the best qualities in the other person. One constantly thinks of the other, and if the opportunity permits, they talk with or meet each other. In this way, the infatuation is deepened.

When the next arrow pierces the heart, separation becomes unbearable. One’s mind and senses are agitated. If opportunity permits, the couple increase their interaction until it covers the entire day. They derive mellows from each other’s association: nectar to start with; then follow other things like children, household responsibilities, etc.

But such a state does not last for long, as the third arrow pierces the heart, which begins to burn. The pain is almost intolerable. One’s intelligence gets bewildered, and one acts like a madman. Often, the relationship enters a problematic phase with frequent frictions producing more heat.

The heat produces dryness as the fourth arrow pierces. One enters the extreme state of pain: break-up, unwanted pregnancy, abortion, divorce, depression, stress, alcoholism, violence, ulcers, hair loss, etc.

Finally, Kāma releases the fifth arrow, which just destroys the victim: suicide, acid-throwing, murder, etc. Death separates even the most intimate couples. In this way, one suffers in this life and the next (entering into ghostly species).

All five arrows are meant to increase the intensity of material entanglement and degrade one into the darkest pits of illusion. Two options are normally available for the conditioned souls:

  1. Bhoga: Some philosophers like Dakṣa Prajāpati say that one must continue to enjoy the material objects according to religious principles until one gets totally burnt out. The nature of passionate energy is that initially it appears like nectar, but later becomes poison. Therefore, when the nectar turns into poison, it is the appropriate time to engage in yoga (union with the spiritual energy). However, these karma-mīmāṃsikās ignore the fact that after performing yoga for some time, the senses again become active, ready to derive nectar from material objects. In fact, by engagement in material gratification, the saṁskāra (passionate energy driving our desires and repeated transmigration) is only deepened. Such bhogī-yogīs soon fall down to perverted material enjoyment and enter hellish planets.

  2. Tyāga: Other philosophers like Āṣṭāvakra say that one must completely renounce material objects and engage in yoga because the material nature is a falsity. The perception of nectar or poison from material objects is due to the illusion of the existence of these objects and one’s separate ego. Through proper knowledge, one can transcend the passionate energy and set oneself free from repeated birth and death. However, these jñāna-mīmāṃsikās forget that even when one renounces the material objects, the stored desires remain, to be evacuated in different ways when opportunities are provided by Māyā. The hṛdaya-granthi is too tight to be untied by cultivation of imaginary knowledge and passive renunciation. Such tyāgī-yogīs fall down due to the dryness of the senses and take birth among species with dormant consciousness, like plants.

Due to the mercy of Kṛṣṇa (God) and His representatives, we have access to an alternative, viz., engagement in devotional service. Śrīla Rūpa Gosvāmī notes:

sarvopādhi-vinirmuktam tat-paratvena nirmalam
hṛṣīkena hṛṣīkeśa-sevanam bhaktir ucyate

The material nature is neither an object of our enjoyment nor is it a falsity. It is a reality meant for the enjoyment of the Master of the senses and the sense-objects, Kṛṣṇa. Similarly, our ego is neither an independent product of the material nature nor a falsity, but a separated part of Kṛṣṇa’s ego. Therefore, it needs to be purified of all material designations (identification of one’s body as the self for material enjoyment) and then engaged in the service of Kṛṣṇa (the constitutional position of our ego) through purified senses. Indeed, the desires for bhoga–tyāga are detrimental to the cultivation of favourable devotional service and can be identified as deviations from the right path.

In devotional service, since the senses and objects of the senses are engaged in the service of Kṛṣṇa, no saṁskāra for material enjoyment is produced. However, the senses do not remain dry due to direct association with Kṛṣṇa, the reservoir of all mellows. The work according to religious principles is performed for the satisfaction of Kṛṣṇa (not for one’s own ego). So, it liberates the ego from repeated transmigration. The cultivation of knowledge is based on the factual position that one’s ego is an eternal servant of Kṛṣṇa (not that everything that exists is false), and the renunciation is based on the active principle of service. Hence, there is no fall to material designations (unless one commits offences and Kṛṣṇa withdraws His mercy).

The complete victory of the devotional process over Kāma was demonstrated by Ṭhākura Haridāsa when he was approached by a beautiful prostitute at midnight in a secluded place. Due to his attachment to the chanting of the Holy Names of Kṛṣṇa, he not only resisted the attempts by the lady to enjoy with him but also transformed her into a pure devotee.

Published as “Arrows of Kama,” Dandavats, 30 September 2011: https://www.dandavats.com/?p=84959

Sunday, 17 April 2011

What is a valid query and what is a self-evident truth?

CRITICALLY ANALYSED 


This article is in the form of a letter addressed to a male devotee who has lost faith in the teachings of Śrīla Prabhupāda, particularly in the effectiveness of chanting the Holy Names, and has expressed his doubts about the validity of faith in the realisation of truth.

Hare Kṛṣṇa! Daṇḍavats!

Let me present to you a few doubts, which I have; please respond:

  1. Do I exist? What is the proof that I exist?

  2. Can you prove to me that the basic premises of knowledge are a reality? Let me explain: why do you accept that you are a male or that rasa-gullā is sweet or that the sun is bright? Why should I assume that such entities exist, that they have stated properties, and that I can actually know them?

  3. Suppose I axiomatically accept (that does not save you from answering the first two questions) that I exist and that what I perceive is reality. However, that does not mean I can generalise my experience. Who decided that the laws of mathematics and logic are self-evident truths? Why should I accept? If you see me with a red face, shouting and banging my fists and kicking objects around me, why do you presume that I am angry? Why does a doctor presume a disease based on symptoms (I am making it easy for you)?

  4. Suppose you tell me that you got 90% on your test. Why should I believe? What is the proof? Even if you present your marksheet and also your academic authority's testimony, how do I know that the documents are not forged or that the authority is not lying? On what premise does the law-court decide such cases? Why does the court trust witnesses and documents, even award capital punishment on that evidence?

  5. How do you know there is a reality beyond what you perceive (if that is a reality)? Why do you think that there is God? Just because you feel, does it make it a reality? How do you know that the world existed before your birth? Maybe time itself began with you. Suppose Kṛṣṇa Himself comes to you. How do you know He is Kṛṣṇa, not some demon in disguise or your own hallucination? Suppose, while chanting, tears rolled from your eyes and your hair stood on end; is that the criterion for accepting the validity of chanting? I do not experience, but you do. Prove to me that it works.

Actually, from birth, we accept certain self-evident truths, and that makes our lives simple. All our questions should be based on certain authoritative premises; otherwise, there are no answers.

If you say I do not experience anything while chanting, how can anyone possibly prove that it works? In fact, your understanding is faulty: you are not experiencing what you think you should experience, not that chanting has no effect. Experiment: How long can a person chant 16 rounds and masturbate daily? Now, if you say, “But we already have a previous conditioning about the purity of chanting and impurity of releasing semen,” then I can ask if you had no previous conception, why would you chant at all? It is more natural to masturbate than to chant. Why? Because we identify more with our physical conditioning. But isn't the Bhagavad-gītā true that sense enjoyment leads to misery? What do you get after masturbating? You feel total waste, an idiot. But after chanting, you do not feel wasted. You feel inspired to serve Kṛṣṇa. Again, you can object on the conditioning ground. That is, if you believed that masturbation is helpful to devotional service, then you would actually experience that. I consider such doubts totally unscientific. But they are valid per se. That does not mean they can be answered.

Every question cannot be answered. One or even multiple failures to get results do not disprove a mathematical law. In college, we used to do many experiments with slide callipers, pendulum, electric meters, mixing chemicals, titration, etc. Even if we did not get standard results after repeated failures, we had to stick to the established measurements. The pendulum thing almost always gave wrong results (g has to be around 9.8 and we got anything from 108 to 2 – I do not remember properly), but we never said Newton was wrong and faithfully recorded some fake numbers to get g ≈ 9.8 (never exact, that is another story). I still believe Newton's calculation is correct and have no hesitation in admitting that it's my fault. Why?

Actually, we are not trained to accept the śabda-pramāṇam. It requires training, beginning with the practice of brahmacaryam. Why can't you accept that Prabhupāda is correct, even if you feel you did not get results? It is difficult because we are not trained. Then someone will raise the question that we are actually brainwashed to accept śabda-pramāṇam or that there are so many scriptures (which is correct). Then you are brainwashed to accept laws of mathematics, logic, grammar, etc., which cannot be empirically verified, if empirical evidence is accepted as reality. What do you say? As far as the multiplicity of scriptures is concerned, śabda-pramāṇam is not just about the revelation of one person. That is the mistake committed by all the religious sects. It requires a more comprehensive premise, which is provided by the Vedic authority. It is not a revelation at a point in history to one person at a particular geographical location. It is about an immemorial tradition of multiple schools with the culture of disputation as well as self-realisation through a spiritual process. It is jñāna-vijñāna-sahitam.

Although we have lost a lot of grey matter by releasing semen and filling our minds with other garbage, by the mercy of Śrīla Prabhupāda, his movement and his books, we have got this rare opportunity. Let us utilise it and make our knowledge and realisation perfect. You will surely get the stated results by chanting. Ceto-darpaṇa-mārjanam… that we can experience immediately. I do. I bet you do too. If not, then you decide. Otherwise, join the saṅkīrtana movement (param vijayate śrī-kṛṣṇa-saṅkīrtanam).

Your servant,
Saurav

Published as “What is a valid query and what is a self-evident truth?,” Dandavats, 17 April 2011: https://www.dandavats.com/?p=9496